Why Scotland Must Not Fall for the "Stay-in-the-EU line"
British Movement believes that not only must Scotland remain part of the United Kingdom, but that Britain must remain a sovereign state outside the globalist web of the European Union.
*** This pre-supposes that the British referendum on staying in or leaving the European Union is a fair and honest election, as it is not beyond the possibilities that certain departments of the State are already 'tasked' to ensure that the result is a fore-gone conclusion and the UK remains in the EU.
When the United Kingdom first joined what was then the European Economic Community back in the 1970's, the British public were conned into believing that Britain was joined a European trading bloc, a 'Common Market', directed from Brussels but with trans-Europe trading opportunities for British industry. In the forty or so years that have passed since then, the European Union has grown and developed into a political juggernaut, with both economic and political ambitions. It has built up a powerful bureaucracy with globalist intentions. The first steps towards the creation of a European super state, directed and controlled from Brussels and Strasbourg. The EU has over recent years created its own political elite with EU appointed diplomats and ministers who aspire to exert power over existing sovereign states and governments.
The bullying attitude of European Commissioners (or should it be Commissars?) towards the Greek government during the recent economic crisis in Greece and the punitive attitude of Brussels towards the non-compliant Hungarian government are indications of how the senior EU ministers see their future role in a unified, single European state.
The signs are all there for all to see; the establishment of a European Single Currency, (the Euro), the Schengen 'open borders' policy, the European Central Bank all steps towards the monolithic single state. The future plan for those neo-liberal internationalists is the eventual absorption of all the countries into a 'United States of Europe', with the disbandment of national governments and the subordination of all legislation and policy making to the European Parliament in Brussels.
The idea of independent states within the framework of the existing European Union is not part of long term strategy of those driving EU expansion and eventual domination.
In terms of their future plans, the United Kingdom as a full EU member would mean the imposition of the Euro as our currency and the transfer of political power from Westminster to Brussels.
Only localised administrative authority would be permitted from London,(Whitehall), Edinburgh (Holyrood), Cardiff and Stormont.
This opposition to the European Union does not mean that British National Socialists share the reactionary opinions of the 'Brexit' factions of the Conservative Party nor the out-dated 'Little England' (but we are not racists) attitudes of UKIP.
The bullying attitude of European Commissioners (or should it be Commissars?) towards the Greek government during the recent economic crisis in Greece and the punitive attitude of Brussels towards the non-compliant Hungarian government are indications of how the senior EU ministers see their future role in a unified, single European state.
The signs are all there for all to see; the establishment of a European Single Currency, (the Euro), the Schengen 'open borders' policy, the European Central Bank all steps towards the monolithic single state. The future plan for those neo-liberal internationalists is the eventual absorption of all the countries into a 'United States of Europe', with the disbandment of national governments and the subordination of all legislation and policy making to the European Parliament in Brussels.
The idea of independent states within the framework of the existing European Union is not part of long term strategy of those driving EU expansion and eventual domination.
In terms of their future plans, the United Kingdom as a full EU member would mean the imposition of the Euro as our currency and the transfer of political power from Westminster to Brussels.
Only localised administrative authority would be permitted from London,(Whitehall), Edinburgh (Holyrood), Cardiff and Stormont.
This opposition to the European Union does not mean that British National Socialists share the reactionary opinions of the 'Brexit' factions of the Conservative Party nor the out-dated 'Little England' (but we are not racists) attitudes of UKIP.
Those fantasists inside the SNP who believe that somehow closer membership with the European Union will allow Scotland to breakaway from the control of Westminster and supposed English domination of Scottish domestic politics.
The reality is that such a move might break Westminster's grip on Scotland only for that condition to be substituted for even tighter control by the EU bureaucrats in Brussels and the EU political aristocracy in Strasbourg.
Major international companies and corporate industries want Britain to remain in the European Union because that suits their trans-continental business model, allowing the easy transfer of manufacturing jobs and company centres to the cheapest locations across Europe. Usually outside the UK but with the option for large European companies to buy up British manufacturing companies or transport and utility companies, switching financial service centres across European borders is easily accomplished.
Where British industry survives, the EU rules allow for indigenous British workers to be undercut and priced out of the jobs market. Big business and corporate interests want to flood the UK, including Scotland with cheap workers for generations to come, the EU free flow of labour allows this to happen. At present this gap is filled by unskilled workers from southern Europe; Romania and Bulgaria provides plenty who will work in Britain for our minimum wage levels. But five or ten years down the line, all those Syrian, Iraqi, Afghan, Iranian and African migrants and refugees who have been allowed to settle in Europe will be eligible to move into the UK legally, and that includes Scotland. Those ex-refugees will provide an even cheaper source of transferable labour across the EU for generations to come.
Where British industry survives, the EU rules allow for indigenous British workers to be undercut and priced out of the jobs market. Big business and corporate interests want to flood the UK, including Scotland with cheap workers for generations to come, the EU free flow of labour allows this to happen. At present this gap is filled by unskilled workers from southern Europe; Romania and Bulgaria provides plenty who will work in Britain for our minimum wage levels. But five or ten years down the line, all those Syrian, Iraqi, Afghan, Iranian and African migrants and refugees who have been allowed to settle in Europe will be eligible to move into the UK legally, and that includes Scotland. Those ex-refugees will provide an even cheaper source of transferable labour across the EU for generations to come.
That is why British Movement believes that for Britain to remain a sovereign nation, Britain must extract itself from the ever tightening coils of the European Union.
